The Bureaucracy–Democracy Nexus: Arguments for a Realistic View
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25159/2663-6549/16447Keywords:
government, performance, bureaucracy, public service, service deliveryAbstract
Background: Bureaucracy and democracy share a lot in common, especially in realising the goal of better living conditions for people in politically organised societies. While bureaucracy has grown in most modern organisations, civil bureaucracy has attracted enormous attention owing to the important task it is saddled with as government fashions ways of carrying out its responsibility to the people under its jurisdiction.
Aim: Within the framework of participatory theory, the article examines the interface between bureaucracy and democracy in Africa with particular reference to Nigeria. The aim was to identify the nature of the relationship that exists between bureaucracy and democracy as well as challenges that face Nigeria in its efforts at democratisation.
Method: This article adopted a qualitative approach and is descriptive in nature, with the researcher setting out to illustrate the association that exists between the dependent and independent variables. Authoritative scholarly sources were reviewed by means of a desktop study. The purpose of the desktop study was to identify relevant publications and apply them to the research question.
Results: This article argues that bureaucracy should be an instrument of democratisation in order to bring the dividends of democracy to the people at all levels of the society. This can only be achieved through the reorientation and transformation of the entire body polity rather than the self-glorification and personal aggrandisement of bureaucrats.
Conclusion: Bureaucracy and democracy have mutually reinforcing features that can be used to launch Africa in general and Nigeria in particular on the path of sustainable growth and development, as well as the provision of welfare and care for the well-being of the people.
References
Adedeji, A. 2017. “Popular Participation, Democracy and Development: Is There a Dialectic Linkage?” In Nigeria: Renewal from the Past: The Struggle for Democratic Development, edited by A. Adedeji, 38–39. London: Zeb Books.
Ademolekun, L. 2017. “Transforming the Civil Service.” In Transition without End: Nigerian Politics and Civil Society under Babangida, edited by L. Diamond, A. Kirk-Greene, and O. Oyediran, 51–62. Ibadan: Vantage Publishers.
Ake, C. 1994. Democratization of Disempowerment in Africa. CASS Occasional Monograph No. 1. Lagos: Malt House Press.
Akhakpe, I. P 2019. Bureaucracy and Good Governance. Lagos: Pumark.
Basil, O. 2019. The Black Man’s Burden: Africa and the Curse of the Nation-State. Ibadan: Spectrum Books Limited.
Cole, G. 2014. Management Theory and Practice. London: Book Power
Dalh, R. A. 1971 Polyarchy. Participation and Opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press,
Hogue, A. S. 2018. “Representative Bureaucracy: Arguments for a Realistic View.” The Quarterly Journal of Administration xix (2): 5–17.
Igbokwe-Ibeto, C. J. 2015. “Representative Democracy and Advocacy for the Poor in Nigeria: Finding the Missing Link.” Journal of Political Science and Public Affairs. https://doi.org/10.4172/2332-0761.1000S1.005
Igbokwe-Ibeto, C. J. 2020. “Analysing the Interface Between Bureaucracy, Interest Groups, and Public Policymaking for Good Governance in Africa.” International Journal of Business and Management Studies 12 (2): 273–288.
Lapalombara, J. 1974. Politics Within Nations: New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Laxmikanth, M. 2016. Public Administration. New Delhi: Tata McGrew Hill Limited.
Okunade, B. 2018. “Democracy and Human Rights in the Context of Twenty-First Century Africa.” In Remaking Africa: Challenges of the Twenty-First Century, edited by O. Oladipo, 65–72. Ibadan: Hope Publication.
Olugbemi, S. 1987. “The Civil Service and Development.” In Alternative Political Futures for Nigeria, edited by S. Olugbemi, 118–125. Abuja: The Nigeria Political Association.
Owolabi, K. 2019. The Quest for Democracy in Nigeria: A Theoretical Exploration. Ibadan: Obaroh and Ogbinaka Publishers.
Oyedele, S. 2020. “Bureaucracy and Democracy.” In Challenges of Sustainable Democracy in Nigeria, edited by E.O. Ojo, 45–55. Ibadan: John Archers Publishers.
Sen, A. 2001. Development as Freedom. 2nd ed. Oxford New York: Oxford University Press.
Ubanagu, Makua. 2023. “71 Million Nigerians Extremely Poor – World Poverty Clock.” Punch, 19 June. https://punchng.com/71-million-nigerians-extremely-poor-world-poverty-clock/
Weber, Max. [1947] 2015. “Bureaucracy.” In Weber’s Rationalism and Modern Society: New Translations on Politics, Bureaucracy, and Social Stratification. Edited and translated by Tony Waters and Dagmar Waters. Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
World Bank, The. 2024. “The World Bank is Helping to Fight Poverty and Improve Living Standards for the People of Nigeria with more than 130 IBID Loans and IDA Credit Since 1958.” Accessed 31 May 2024. https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/nigeria/ overview#:~:text=The%20poverty%20rate%20is%20estimated,largest%20poor%20population%20after%20India
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright will be vested in Unisa Press. However, as long as you do not use the article in ways which would directly conflict with the publisher’s business interests, you retain the right to use your own article (provided you acknowledge the published version of the article) as follows:
- to make further copies of all or part of the published article for your use in classroom teaching;
- to make copies of the final accepted version of the article for internal distribution within your institution, or to place it on your own or your institution’s website or repository, or on a site that does not charge for access to the article, but you must arrange not to make the final accepted version of the article available to the public until 18 months after the date of acceptance;
- to re-use all or part of this material in a compilation of your own works or in a textbook of which you are the author, or as the basis for a conference presentation.