Investigating Dialogical Argumentation and Assessment for Learning as Instructional Model for Teaching Static Electricity to Science Learners

Noluthando Hlazo

doi:10.25159/2312-3540/17379

Authors

Noluthando Hlazo Lecturer https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5805-1802

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25159/2312-3540/17379

Keywords:

argumentation, Dialogical Argumentation and Assessment for Learning as Instructional Model (DAAFLIM), electrostatics, lightning, performance

Abstract

In many rural areas in South Africa, some deaths are thought to result from lightning which is associated with witchcraft, and some victims are accused of being behind lightning witchcraft. In such communities people believe that lightning can be sent through the practice of witchcraft to kill an enemy. This study investigated the effects of using the Dialogical Argumentation and Assessment for Learning as Instructional Model (DAAFLIM) in teaching static electricity focusing on lightning as an example of static electricity to grade 10 learners. Three classes of learners from two township schools served as the study’s sample. A Solomon three-group design was employed in collecting data. One class was used as the experimental group and the other two were the control groups: control 1 group and control 2 group. The frameworks that were applied in the analysis of the data were Toulmin’s Argumentation Pattern (TAP) and Ogunniyi’s Contiguity Argumentation Theory (CAT). The results showed that the experimental group was more elaborate in their explanations of the scientific nature of lightning and achieved better academically than the control group which was not exposed to the DAAFLIM. It was also discovered that learners do not actually leave their traditional ideas at home while other learners come with some scientific conceptions about lightning. The study recommended that the DAAFLIM could be applied more effectively and efficiently if combined with technology. This would also help to include more sensory organs, and in that way provide better learning.

References

Aikenhead, G. S. 2002. “Cross-Cultural Science Teaching: Rekindling Traditions for Aboriginal Students.” Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education 2: 287–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926150209556522 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14926150209556522

Ajani, O. A. 2020. “Teachers’ Professional Development in South African High Schools: How Well Does it Suit Their Professional Needs?” African Journal of Development Studies 10 (3): 59–79. https://doi.org/10.31920/2634-3649/2020/10n3a4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31920/2634-3649/2020/10n3a4

Alexander, R. J. 2008. Essays on Pedagogy. Routledge.

Andrade, H., A. Lui, M. Palma, and J. Hefferen. 2015. “Formative Assessment in Dance Education.” Journal of Dance Education 15 (2): 47–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/15290824.2015.1004408 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15290824.2015.1004408

Andriessen, J. 2006. “Arguing to Learn.” In The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences, edited by R. K. Sawyer. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816833.027 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816833.027

Asterhan, C. S. C., and B. B. Schwarz. 2007. “The Effects of Monological and Dialogical Argumentation on Concept Learning in Evolutionary Theory.” Journal of Educational Psychology 99 (3): 626-639. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.626 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.626

Black, P. J. 1998. Testing: Friend or Foe? Theory and Practice of Assessment and Testing. Falmer Press.

Black, P., and D. William. 2009. “Developing the Theory of Formative Assessment.” Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability 21: 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5

Cazden, C. B. 2001. Classroom Discourse: the Language of Teaching and Learning. 2nd ed. Heinemann.

Chinn, C. A., and D. B. Clark. 2013. “Learning Through Collaborative Argumentation.” In The International Handbook of Collaborative Learning, edited by Cindy E. Hmelo-Silver. Routledge.

Darmawansah, D., G. J. Hwang, and C. J. Lin. 2024. “Integrating Dialectical Constructivist Scaffolding-Based Argumentation Mapping to Support Students’ Dialectical Thinking, Oral and Dialogical Argumentation Complexity.” Educational Technology Research and Development 72: 3241–3269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-024-10395-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-024-10395-5

Department of Basic Education. 2011. Curriculum and Assessment Policy Statement (CAPS). Physical Sciences: Final Draft. Government Printer.

Diwu, C. T., and M. B. Ogunniyi. 2012. “Dialogical Argumentation Instruction as a Catalytic Agent for the Integration of School Science With Indigenous Knowledge Systems.” African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 16 (3): 333–347. https://doi.org/10.1080/10288457.2012.10740749 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10288457.2012.10740749

Driver, R., P. Newton, and J. Osborne. 2000. “Establishing the Norms of Scientific Argumentation in Classrooms.” Science Education 84 (3): 287–312. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200005)84:3<287::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-A DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200005)84:3<287::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-A

Erduran, S., S. Simon., and J. Osborne. 2004. “TAPping into Argumentation: Developments in the Application of Toulmin’s Argument Pattern for Studying Science Discourse.” Science Education 88 (6): 915–933. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20012

Ersoy, F. N., and R. Dilber. 2014. “Comparison of Two Different Techniques on Students’ Understandings of Static Electric Concepts.” International Journal of İnnovation and Learning 16 (1): 67–80. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJIL.2014.063374 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJIL.2014.063374

George, F., K. L. Langenhoven, and C. Fakudze. 2019. “The Effectiveness of DAAFLIM in Teaching N2-TVET College Engineering Science Concepts.” In Proceedings of the 27th annual conference of the Southern African Association for Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education (SAARMSTE), edited by M. Good and C. Stevenson-Milln. SAARMSTE.

Hagop, A. Y. 2015. “A Framework for Guiding Future Citizens to Think Critically About Nature of Science and Socioscientific Issues.” Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education 15 (3): 248–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2015.1051671 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2015.1051671

Hattie, J. 2023. Visible Learning: The Sequel. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003380542 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003380542

Hlazo, N. 2021. “Effects of Dialogical Argumentation-Assessment for Learning Instructional Model on Grade 10 Learners’ Conceptions and Performance on Static Electricity.” PhD diss., University of the Western Cape.

Irons, A. 2008. Enhancing Learning Through Formative Assessment and Feedback. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203934333 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203934333

Jegede, O. J. 1995. “Collateral Learning and the Eco-Cultural Paradigm in Science and Mathematics Education in Africa.” Studies in Science Education 25: 97–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057269508560051 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03057269508560051

Kingston, N., and B. Nash. 2011. “Formative Assessment: A Meta-Analysis and a Call for Research.” Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice 30 (4): 28–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2011.00220.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2011.00220.x

Kuhn, D. 2005. Education for Thinking. Harvard University Press.

Liu, C., and S. Yu. 2022. “Reconceptualizing the Impact of Feedback in Second Language Writing: A Multidimensional Perspective.” Assessing Writing 53: 100630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2022.100630 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2022.100630

Makgatho, M., and A. Mji. 2006. “Factors Associated With High School Learners’ Poor Performance: A Spotlight on Mathematics and Science.” South African Journal of Education 26 (2): 253–266.

Mavuru, L., and U. Ramnarain. 2020. “Learners’ Socio-Cultural Backgrounds and Science Teaching and Learning: A Case Study of Township Schools in South Africa.” Cultural Studies of Science Education 15 (4): 1067–1095. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-020-09974-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-020-09974-8

McManus, S., ed. 2008. Attributes of Effective Formative Assessment. Council of Chief State School Officers.

Moyo, P. V., and R. Kizito. 2014. “Prospects and Challenges of Using the Argumentation Instructional Method to Indigenise School Science Teaching.” African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 18 (2): 113–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/10288457.2014.912831 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10288457.2014.912831

Newton, P., R. Driver, and J. Osborne. 1999. “The Place of Argumentation in the Pedagogy of School Science.” International Journal of Science Education 21 (5): 553–576. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006999290570 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/095006999290570

Ngobeni, N. R., M. I. Chibambo, and J. J. Divala. 2023. “Curriculum Transformations in South Africa: Some Discomforting Truths on Interminable Poverty and Inequalities in Schools and Society.” Frontiers in Education 8: 1132167. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1132167 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1132167

Ogunniyi, M. B. and M. G. Hewson. 2008. “Effect of an Argumentation-Based Course on Teachers’ Disposition Towards a Science-Indigenous Knowledge Curriculum.” International Journal of Environmental and Science Education 3 (4): 159–177.

Ogunniyi, M. B. 2005. “Relative Effects of a History, Philosophy and Sociology of Science Course on Teachers’ Understanding of the Nature of Science and Instructional Practice.” South African Journal of Higher Education 19: 1464–1472. https://doi.org/10.4314/sajhe.v19i7.50262 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4314/sajhe.v19i7.50262

Ogunniyi, M. B. 2007. “Teachers’ Stances and Practical Arguments Regarding a Science-Indigenous Knowledge Curriculum: Part 2.” International Journal of Science Education 29 (10): 1189–1207. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600931038 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600931038

Ogunniyi, M. B. 2011. “The Context of Training Teachers to Implement a Socially Relevant Science Education in Africa.” African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 15 (3): 98–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/10288457.2011.10740721 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10288457.2011.10740721

Ozan, C., and R. Y. Kincal. 2018. “The Effects of Formative Assessment on Academic Achievement, Attitudes Toward the Lesson, and Self-Regulation Skills.” Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice 18 (1): 85–118.

Phillips H. N. 2023. “Developing Critical Thinking in Classrooms: Teacher Responses to a Reading-for-Meaning Workshop.” Reading and Writing 14 (1): A401. https://doi.org/10.4102/rw.v14i1.401 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/rw.v14i1.401

Rapanta, C., and M. K. Felton. 2022. “Learning to Argue Through Dialogue: A Review of Instructional Approaches.” Educational Psychology Review 34: 477–509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09637-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09637-2

Regmi, J., and M. Fleming. 2012. “Indigenous Knowledge and Science in a Globalized Age.” Cultural Studies of Science Education 7: 479–484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-012-9389-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-012-9389-z

Rodriguez, M. L., L. T. Ortiz, C. Alzueta, A. Rebole, and J. Trevino. 2005. “Nutritive Value of High-Oleic Acid Sunflower Seed for Broiler Chickens.” Poultry Science 84 (3): 395–402. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/84.3.395 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/84.3.395

Salter, A. F., and M. D. Renken. 2017. “A Review of the Benefits of Argumentation in the Science Classroom.” Georgia Journal of Science 75 (1): 108.

Sampson, V., and D. Clark. 2009. “The Impact of Collaboration on the Outcomes of Scientific Argumentation.” Science Education 93 (3): 448–484. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20306 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20306

Sawyer, R. K. 2004. “Creative Teaching Collaborative Discussion as Disciplined Improvisation.” Educational Researcher 33: 12–20. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033002012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033002012

Schwarz, B. B. 2009. “Argumentation and Learning.” In Argumentation and Education: Theoretical Foundations and Practices, edited by Nathalie Muller Mirza and Anne-Nelly Perret-Clermont. Springer.

Shepard, L. A. 2000. “The Role of Assessment in a Learning Culture.” Educational Researcher 29 (7): 4–14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X029007004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X029007004

Simon, S., and S. Johnson. 2008. “Professional Learning Portfolios for Argumentation in School Science.” International Journal of Science Education 30 (5): 669–688. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701854873 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701854873

Stefanidou, C. G., K. D. Tsalapati, A. M. Ferentinou, and C. D. Skordoulis. 2019. “Conceptual Difficulties Pre-Service Primary Teachers Have with Static Electricity.” Journal of Baltic Science Education 18 (2): 300–313. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/19.18.300 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/19.18.300

Steyn, G. M. 2008. “Continuing Professional Development for Teachers in South Africa and Social Learning Systems: Conflicting Conceptual Frameworks of Learning.” Koers: Bulletin for Christian Scholarship 73 (1): 15–31. https://doi.org/10.4102/koers.v73i1.151 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/koers.v73i1.151

Swaffield, S. 2011. “Getting to the Heart of Authentic Assessment for Learning.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 18 (4): 433–449. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2011.582838 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2011.582838

Taras, M. 2007. “Assessment for Learning: Understanding Theory to Improve Practice.” Journal of Further and Higher Education 31: 363–371. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098770701625746 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03098770701625746

Toulmin, S. 1958. The Uses of Argument. Cambridge University Press.

Wuest, D. A., and J. L. Fisette. 2012. Foundations of Physical Education, Exercise Science, and Sport. 17th ed. McGraw-Hill.

Wylie, E. C., and J. Ciafalo. 2010. “Documenting, Diagnosing, and Treating Misconceptions: Impact on Student Learning.” Paper Presented at the Meeting of the American Educational Research Association Conference, Denver, CO.

Xue, Y., and C. D. Bickel. 2003. “Creating a System of Accountability: The Impact of Instructional Assessment on Elementary Children’s Achievement Test Scores.” Education Policy Analysis Archives 11 (9). https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v11n9.2003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v11n9.2003

Yeh, S. S. 2009. “Class Size Reduction or Rapid Formative Assessment? A Comparison of Cost-Effectiveness.” Educational Research Review 4 (1): 7–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2008.09.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2008.09.001